Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4210 (7549)

This looks correct to me.  I think it should be approved.

Russ

> On Jun 23, 2023, at 3:02 AM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4210,
> "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7549
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Rufus Buschart <[email protected]>
> 
> Section: 3.1.2. point 11
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> correct RA of CA public key
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> correct RA or CA public key
> 
> Notes
> -----
>> From the context it is obvious that there is a typo in the original text. This claim is supported by the fact that the "r" and the "f" key are next to each other on the keyboard.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC4210 (draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2510bis-09)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)
> Publication Date    : September 2005
> Author(s)           : C. Adams, S. Farrell, T. Kause, T. Mononen
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509)
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pkix mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix