[pkix] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3647 (7926 )

oh that's very good to know!

(and it makes me wonder what email address you have for me - and my one and
only RFC)

I hope that at some point we can unify the errata system and the
datatracker and whatever else has its own bespoke systems.

Deb

On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 5:16 PM Rebecca VanRheenen <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Deb,
>
> Currently, the errata system is separate from datatracker. We reached out
> to Santosh to confirm the preferred email address for errata notifications,
> and we updated the errata system database accordingly.
>
> As you suggest, Santosh can also update contact information in the
> datatracker by using https://datatracker.ietf.org/accounts/profile/ (but
> this has no effect on the RFC errata system at this time).
>
> Best regards,
> Rebecca for the RFC Editor
>
>
> > On May 10, 2024, at 3:48 AM, Deb Cooley <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > You can change your default email address on your datatracker page.
> > Obviously, your view of this will be different:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/person/[email protected]
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 3:35 PM Santosh Chokhani <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > I agree with this editorial erratum.  Note that my e-mail address has
> changed.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: RFC Errata System [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 11:39 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> > Subject: [pkix] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3647 (7926)
> >
> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3647, "Internet
> X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Policy and Certification
> Practices Framework".
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > You may review the report below and at:
> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7926
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > Type: Editorial
> > Reported by: Philip Porada <[email protected]>
> >
> > Section: 6
> >
> > Original Text
> > -------------
> >    1.4.1.  Appropriate certificate uses
> >
> > Corrected Text
> > --------------
> >    1.4.1  Appropriate certificate uses
> >
> > Notes
> > -----
> > There was an extra period trailing the subsection header number.
> >
> > Instructions:
> > -------------
> > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it will
> be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please use "Reply All" to
> discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is
> reached, the verifying party will log in to change the status and edit the
> report, if necessary.
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > RFC3647 (draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-new-rfc2527-02)
> > --------------------------------------
> > Title               : Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure
> Certificate Policy and Certification Practices Framework
> > Publication Date    : November 2003
> > Author(s)           : S. Chokhani, W. Ford, R. Sabett, C. Merrill, S. Wu
> > Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> > Source              : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509)
> > Stream              : IETF
> > Verifying Party     : IESG
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pkix mailing list -- [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pkix mailing list -- [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
>

_______________________________________________
pkix mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]