[pkix] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3280 (9097 )
Peter Gutmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.x509 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ME2P300MB782154E03535D20ED87C6CE36BEEDB2@ME2P300MB782154.AUSP300.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> |
Russ Housley <[email protected]> writes: >RFC 3280 is obsolete; it has been replaced by RFC 5280. I do not see any >reason to process this errata. Just a general observation, there are a ton of non-IETF standards that have normative refs to older RFCs (I don't know how many industry standards still reference draft-nourse-scep-23, to take one extreme example). I don't know if this is the case here since the submitter didn't provide any background for why the change was needed, but if it's required to clear up a problem with another standard that references it then it may be worth making the change. Admittedly 2459 would be a bit of a stretch... Peter. _______________________________________________ pkix mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]