Re: The role of media types for XML content
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]> Thu, 16 Jun 2005 03:22:17 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.xml-mime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mark, Mark> I agree with your premise that a new media type for each new XML Mark> vocabulary is not a scalable, long-term solution. But neither do I Mark> think that application/xml is a solution. Here we agree. (I suppose you meant application/xml combined with namespace sniffing.) Mark> The work being done in the Mark> CDF WG may provide one, I think that a long-term solution is badly needed and that it is likely to be different from media types. Mark> but for now though, I agree with Liam and Mark> Martin that a new media type makes the most sense. Here we do not agree. I think that the advantages of specialized media types are rather minor. I am not aware of any complaints about the lack of specialized media types for W3C XML Schema. Cheers, -- MURATA Makoto <[email protected]>