Re: W3C Last Call and Media Type request for comments: XSLT 2.0
Chris Lilley <[email protected]> Thu, 8 Sep 2005 22:29:26 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.types,gmane.ietf.xml-mime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday, September 8, 2005, 8:48:53 PM, 'Liam wrote: LQ> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:12:43PM -0400, Scott Hollenbeck wrote: >> Thanks, but my point is that you need to put this info in the template >> itself. LQ> OK, noted. LQ> Note that the information is also elsewhere in the published LQ> specification -- it's at the beginning of the document -- since LQ> this Internet Type information is being published as part LQ> of a larger document. LQ> Liam Liam, this has come up before as W3C uses the new process. The requirement to make the registration template an appendix in the spec means that people tend to forget that the appendix also has the be read as an independent document by the people here. The appendix has to make sense as a standalone registrations, so rather than saying "this document" say "the document at (url) called (title)". -- Chris Lilley mailto:[email protected] Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG