Re: W3C Last Call and Media Type request for comments: XSLT 2.0
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> Sat, 10 Sep 2005 03:25:06 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.types,gmane.ietf.xml-mime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <6.0.0.20.2.20050910031859.04c45150@localhost> |
At 05:29 05/09/09, Chris Lilley wrote: >this has come up before as W3C uses the new process. The requirement to >make the registration template an appendix in the spec means that people >tend to forget that the appendix also has the be read as an independent >document by the people here. Just a small point: There is no requirement that the template be an *appendix*. For many specs, making the template an appendix will work out fine, but it could as well be a section or subsection if that works better for the spec in question. >The appendix has to make sense as a standalone registrations, so rather >than saying "this document" say "the document at (url) called (title)". Yes, indeed. It will be self-referencing :-). Regards, Martin.