Re: MPEG asks for MIME review for the MPEG21 file format
Chris Lilley <[email protected]> Fri, 18 May 2007 03:12:09 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.xml-mime,gmane.ietf.types |
|---|---|
| Organization | W3C |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday, May 17, 2007, 9:17:50 PM, Larry wrote: LM> I believe the +xml suffix should be reserved for media types whose content LM> can be LM> parsed without any preprocessing by a generic XML parser. A reply LM> from David Singer indicated that the proposed MPEG 21file format is "binary LM> and contains within it either XML text or BiM-encoded XML (like a ZIP LM> archive LM> with an XML document as the main document.)" LM> In that case, the use of +xml would (IMO) be inappropriate. I agree. LM> I thought this was clear form RFC 3023, but perhaps not. The successor to RFC 3023 needs to indicate that binary XML which is presented as a new encoding (in the xml sense) can use +xml, while other binary forms cannot. -- Chris Lilley mailto:[email protected] Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG