RE: draft-ietf-roamops-phonebook-xml-05.txt

Given that <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-murata-xml-08.txt> is
still in IETF last call, I do not think it is necessary to modify your
draft.

Instead, I would suggest an informational supplement with the registration,
or just making a registration straight to IANA (as described in RFC 2048,
with review on [email protected]).

		- dan
--
Dan Kohn <mailto:[email protected]>
<http://www.dankohn.com>  <tel:+1-650-327-2600>

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, 2000-09-14 07:04
To: Dan Kohn
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-roamops-phonebook-xml-05.txt


Dan,

Given that this particular document has already been through WG, IESG *and*
IETF last call, how strongly do you feel about this proposed appendix?

PatC
> I would recommend adding an appendix to
>
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-roamops-phonebook-xml-05.txt
> > where you register a MIME type for a roamops phonebook based on the
advice
> provided in <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-murata-xml-08.txt>.
> 
> It would appear that application/phonebook+xml may be a good choice.
> 
> 		- dan
> --
> Dan Kohn <mailto:[email protected]>
> <http://www.dankohn.com>  <tel:+1-650-327-2600>