Re: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xml
"Simon St.Laurent" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.xml-mime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 02:53 PM 10/18/00 -0400, Mark Baker wrote: >Something we did consider, that we didn't really come to concensus on >(AFAIK) at this morning's call was the possibility of registering both >application/xhtml+xml and text/xhtml+xml, and letting server admins >decide which one wins (or if both are useful). Any thoughts about that? I'd prefer to see JUST 'application/xhtml+xml', but could settle for having both. Transitions are never easy, it seems. Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. XHTML: Migrating Toward XML http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books