> RFC 2854 describes the applicability of 'text/html'; I would like to
> ask that any document that talks about the any other MIME type that
> might be used at least refer to it.
> I actually think that the double 'x' in 'xhtml+xml' is redundant,
> and that 'application/html+xml' might be more appropriate.
Interesting notion. On the one hand, you're right that it is redundant,
on the other, html+xml doesn't embed the XHTML "name" in the media type.
On the whole I think I agree with you, although I do see the case for
having xhtml+xml.
Ned
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.