RE: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xml
"Gavin Thomas Nicol" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.xml-mime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> In effect, application/xml is a proxy for x-whatever1/whatever2+xml, > which by the rules for "x-" (don't interpret it unless you know > what you are doing) can't be treated as XML by ignorant processors. Right, hence my preference for text/xml and application/foo+xml.