Fwd: Protocol Action: XML Media Types to Proposed Standard
"Simon St.Laurent" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.xml-mime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This list wasn't CC'd, but I thought you all might want to know. >To: IETF-Announce: ; >Cc: RFC Editor <[email protected]>, IANA <[email protected]> >Cc: Internet Architecture Board <[email protected]> >From: The IESG <[email protected]> >Subject: Protocol Action: XML Media Types to Proposed Standard >Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:38:26 -0500 > > > >The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'XML Media Types' ><draft-murata-xml-09.txt> as a Proposed Standard. This has been >reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an IETF Working Group. >The IESG contact persons are Patrik Faltstrom and Ned Freed. > > >Technical Summary > >This document is an update of RFC 2376. It standardizes five media >types -- text/xml, application/xml, text/xml-external-parsed-entity, >application/xml-external-parsed-entity, and application/xml-dtd -- >for use in exchanging network entities that are related to the >Extensible Markup Language (XML). This document also standardizes a >convention (using the suffix '+xml') for naming media types outside >of these five types when those media types represent XML entities. > >Major differences from RFC 2376 are (1) the addition of >text/xml-external-parsed-entity, >application/xml-external-parsed-entity, and application/xml-dtd, (2) >the '+xml' suffix convention (which also updates the RFC 2048 >registration process), and (3) the discussion of "utf-16le" and >"utf-16be". > >Working Group Summary > >Discussions about this memo has occurred on a number of mailing >lists, including [email protected] and [email protected]. >There appears to be consensus for this update of RFC 2376. > >Protocol Quality > >Ned Freed has reviewed the specification for the IESG. > Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. XHTML: Migrating Toward XML http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books