RE: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xml
"Gavin Thomas Nicol" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.xml-mime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> This continued argument about the exact nature of past
> mistakes is going nowhere fast, so I'm not going to
> bother to respond further to it.
Fine. One question though...
Given
1) choices for types
text/xml
application/xml
application/foo+xml
2) clear guidelines on their use.
do *you* have faith that developers
will do what is right?