Re: model/uml+xml
"Martin J. Duerst" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.xml-mime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 01/01/10 16:04 +0000, Daniel Biddle wrote: >I don't believe UML has models in the sense RFC 2077 defines. For >instance, UML models don't "have scaling or calibration factors which are >related to physical units (force, momentum, time, velocity, acceleration, >size, etc.)." [RFC 2077 s.2] I agree. >Maybe you should change that example to something more plausible. >(Sorry, I haven't found any good candidates yet.) Something like model/x3d ? Regards, Martin.