Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter
MURATA Makoto <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.xml-mime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 04:42:01 +0200 > > * Michael Brennan wrote: > >Mentioning UTF-16 in this example is not absurd at all. > > It is at least misleading, since it doesn't say, > this case is invalid and won't work. In fact, it > implies the contrary to me. When we create a new RFC, we should rename the subsection. 8.5 INCONSISTENT EXAMPLE: Text/xml with Omitted Charset is better than 8.5 Text/xml with Omitted Charset Cheers, Makoto