Re: [xml-dev] Registration status (corr.)

On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Ian Graham wrote:
...

> I think (ii) is the $1000 question.  A $500 question might be: "Did the
> authors of RFC 3023 consider the RFC 2912 mechanism for providing internal
> data about XML typed data?" (RFC 2912 isn't mentioned in 3023).
> 
> I can imagine many possible reasons (e.g., easy adaptation for current
> MIME dispatchers), but would like to know which one the authors found most
> compelling. 
> 

By which I meant to say "I can imagine many possible reasons for the model
presented in RFC 3023 (...."

Ian