Re: Media types
Graham Klyne <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.xml-mime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 04:55 PM 1/9/02 -0500, Mark Baker wrote: >I raised this with the authors of RFC 3023 long ago, but they rejected >it. But I believe it remains worth considering. It seems to me to be >a nice bridge, similar to the one the XMLP WG has taken with >"relocating" SOAPAction to a parameter on the proposed SOAP media >type[1]. I think I understand why it was rejected in the discussions for RFC 3023, and I think those reasons were valid in that context. But I don't think that means the idea is completely without merit. I think there is some concern about how well Content-type parameters are handled by deployed MIME applications, but that seems less of an issue for newer Web applications. I remain agnostic. #g -- ------------------- Graham Klyne <[email protected]>