Re: draft-reagle-xenc-mediatype-01.txt

At 15:00 02/08/08 -0400, Joseph Reagle wrote:
>As Ned and Martin point out, the intent is to express the fact that
>"application/xenc+xml" is XML, and consequently shares the same charset and
>encoding semantics/processing as that defined in RFC 3023.

Well, what the spec currently writes is okay, but what
you just write above is not:

The intent is to say that application/xenc+xml shares the same
charset behaviour as application/xml defined in RFC 3023.
(text/xml behaves differently)


Regards,   Martin.