Re: draft-reagle-xenc-mediatype-01.txt
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> Tue, 20 Aug 2002 11:19:58 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.xml-mime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <4.2.0.58.J.20020820111249.03c13680@localhost> |
Hello Aaron, dear RDF Core WG, On [email protected] and some related list, we were just looking at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlenc-core/#sec-MediaType which containes some instances of text like this: Same as ... of application/xml as specified in RFC 3023[XML-MT] or the most recent specification that supercedes it. There seemed to be general agreement that a moving target is not a good idea. Josef Reagle told us that he got that text from: http://www.aaronsw.com/2002/rdf-mediatype.html I wanted to tell you that you may want to fix this. Regards, Martin. At 14:47 02/08/19 -0400, Joseph Reagle wrote: >On Thursday 08 August 2002 06:07 pm, Larry Masinter wrote: > > # Optional parameters: charset > > # Same as charset parameter of application/xml as > > # specified in RFC 3023 [XML-MT] or the most recent > > # specification that supersedes it. > > > > I admit I was a little confused on this one, and misread > > what it said. However, I don't understand > > "or the most recent specification that supersedes it", > > though, since a specification may supercede RFC 3023 > > but not be appropriate for a reference to a particular > > section. > >I'm happy to eliminate that text as I oppose those sort of references in >general. In this case, I was merely following what I could see the rdf >folks doing for a similar type of registration: > http://www.aaronsw.com/2002/rdf-mediatype.html >