Re: Internet draft for sbml+xml media type

Ben Kovitz wrote:

> Any thoughts?  Restricting sbml+xml to a UTF-8 encoding would 
> certainly be simple, imposing no new requirements on 
> SBML-consuming tools.  But would this go against the grain of 
> the relevant RFCs and future evolvability? 

I think this would be just fine for a start.  If it turns out there's 
demands for other formats, you could wire that in later, but at the 
moment this seems like a sensibly minimalist approach.
-- 
Cheers, Tim Bray (http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/)