Re: proposed media type registration: application/voicexml+xml
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:12:56 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.xml-mime |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <4.2.0.58.J.20031216180134.06e36e20@localhost> |
Hello Linus, At 23:43 03/12/16 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >tis 2003-12-16 klockan 22.32 skrev Martin Duerst: > > > I just by chance realized that you had removed the 'charset' > > parameter from the registration for application/voicexml+xml, > > and also for application/ssml+xml. I have found something similar > > in other recent registration proposals. > >Now, wait a second here. > >Now there is Martin Duerst from W3.org telling us that we must >indeed include a "charset" parameter with our foo/bar+xml >MIME transport types. > >Then there is Chris Lilley of the same W3.org telling us *repeatedly* >to remove it: First, we are on an IETF list, which means that we are all acting as concerned individuals, and that we are mainly interested in getting the best possible solution. >Now, I've been trusting Chris up til now, simply because he >represents W3.org. > >You are of course welcome to run your internal disputes on the >issue on these lists if you like, but when you're already at the >same organizational body, could you *PLEASE* book an internal meeting >and try to formulate a consensus from the W3.org side on how you >think this thing should be handled? After all, you invented XML. Sorry I forgot to mention it, but Chris and me actually had such a 'meeting' last week, and the email I wrote was the result of this (and a phone call with Max). Regards, Martin.