Re: proposed media type registration: application/voicexml+xml

On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 12:20:01AM +0900, MURATA Makoto wrote:
> However, even in this case, I
> am sympathetic to Martin's worry ("we start to get into a patchwork").
> In all other cases, I do not want to allow omission of the charset
> parameter.  How do others feel?

Do we know that all existing application/*+xml types define the charset
param by reference to 3023?  If so, then I agree;  I believe that the
benefit of this simplification outweighs the cost of (potential)
redundancy.

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca