Re: Relative NS if Exclusive C14n?

Yes, it is. There is a protocol ('foo') and the "path" ('bar').

Aleksey.

Christian Geuer-Pollmann wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> short question about the examples in the "Exclusive XML 
> Canonicalization" PR:
>
>
> The section "2.2 General Problems with re-Enveloping" contains this babe:
>
>   xmlns:n0="foo:bar"
>
> My question is:
>
>   Is this a relative namespace?
>
> xmlns:n0="urn:foo" is not, but the above?
>
>
> Christian