Re: Relative NS if Exclusive C14n?

Yes, I really mean that this URI is *absolute* :) Sorry for confusion.

Aleksey

Joseph Reagle wrote:

>It is not a relative URI. It does not meet the production rule for a 
>relative URI.
>  relativeURI   = ( net_path | abs_path | rel_path ) [ "?" query ]
>  http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt
>
>(As Merlin surmises, perhaps this is what Aleksey meant.)
>
>
>On Thursday 23 May 2002 12:00, Aleksey Sanin wrote:
>
>>Yes, it is. There is a protocol ('foo') and the "path" ('bar').
>>
>>>  xmlns:n0="foo:bar"
>>>