Re: A simple test of XPath filter performance
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> Fri, 31 May 2002 14:53:07 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.xmldsig |
|---|---|
| Organization | W3C |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I've added a row in the xpath-filter2 interop matrix and indicate that
Merlin satisfies the requirement [1]. Christian and Aleksey, can you send
me a guestimate too? While I completely agree with John on the desirability
of this result and I think we should push this as far as we can, I don't
think we can make it a MUST nor am I confident about specifying
implementation specific type optimizations. I hope that we will *soon* (if
we don't already) have a spec that is capable of satisfying our
requirements and it would be better to make it available to folks sooner
than later given even slow implementations of this are vastly superior to
the existing specification algorithm.
[1] http://www.w3.org/Signature/2002/02/01-exc-c14n-interop.html
performance: signature generation and verification over
sign-xfdl.xml: in 500ms on ~700 bogomips machine. SHOULD