Re: Question: Status of Additional XML Security URIs

Hi Jospeh,

I've been thinking I should polish it a little and submit it as an
Informational RFC. A W3C Note or internal version of it could certainly
be produced as well, same as the base XMLDSIG document is issued in both
organizations.

I'm not sure if there are any pending specific additions although there
have been a few which have been discussed in generalities. I'd
appreciate it if anyone who had some specific request for an addition
could send me some specific wording.

Thanks,
Donald
======================================================================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd                       [email protected]
 155 Beaver Street              +1-508-634-2066(h) +1-508-851-8280(w)
 Milford, MA 01757 USA                   [email protected]

On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Joseph Reagle wrote:

> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 16:59:48 -0400
> From: Joseph Reagle <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Question: Status of Additional XML Security URIs
> Resent-Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 16:59:52 -0400 (EDT)
> Resent-From: [email protected]
>
>
>
> Donald, the "Additional XML Security URIs"  [1] draft will be expiring in
> July. What should we do next with it? I don't think we've had many requests
> for additions recently. Do you want to publish it as an Informational RFC?
> Another option is to publish it on the W3C site. One could do it as a NOTE,
> or even more informally, just as a document in the date space (e.g.,
> /2002/01/foo) as just a staff/administrative thingie. Not good for
> normative references, but it can be useful to applications...
>
> [1] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-eastlake-xmldsig-uri-02.txt
>
>