Re: Y5 Exclusive C145n interop; was Re: c14n/exc-c14n interop samples
Joseph Reagle <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Jun 2002 11:25:18 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.xmldsig |
|---|---|
| Organization | W3C |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday 05 June 2002 09:53 am, merlin wrote: > Perfect. Ok, so aside from typos and bits of cruft I've introduced in editing (please let me know) I think we've greatly improved upon the specification of the processing. http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xml-exc-c14n $Revision: 1.72 $ 1. I tweaked step 3 in the specification to be positive (rules for rendering instead of ignoring so as to be consistent wi th everything else.) 2. I gave the implementation its own little section: "3.1 Constrained Implementation (non-normative)" 3. In the implementation I broke out the creation of ns_rendered as its own (first) step. 4. The last step is now clear with respect to ns_rendered. > >http://www.w3.org/Signature/2002/02/01-exc-c14n-interop.html > >new revision: 1.22 > > BTW, the interop report says Excl[ui]sve. Fixed.