Re: Y5 Exclusive C145n interop; was Re: c14n/exc-c14n interop samples

r/[email protected]/2002.06.05/12:32:43
>On Wednesday 05 June 2002 12:23 pm, merlin wrote:
>> Agreed, things are much more clear. §3, 4.3.3,
>
>Try a refresh. I don't see a §3, 4.3.3, and 4.3 is about xmlns="" not 
>namespace node prefixes...

Meant to say §3, 3.3: 
  3. ...
    3. it has not yet been rendered by any output ancestor, or the
       nearest output ancestor of its parent element that visibly utilizes
       the namespace prefix has a namespace node in the node-set with the a
       different namespace prefix and value as N.

>>   "...the nearest output ancestor of its parent element that visibly
>>    utilizes the namespace prefix has a namespace node in the node-set
>>    with the a different namespace prefix and value as N."
>>
>> This doesnt't quite capture it. Either:
>>   "...the nearest output ancestor of its parent element that visibly
>>    utilizes the namespace prefix does not have a namespace node in
>>    the node-set with the same prefix and value as N."
>> Or:
>>   "...the nearest output ancestor of its parent element that visibly
>>    utilizes the namespace prefix has a namespace node in the node-set
>>    with the same prefix and a different value than N, or has no
>>    namespace node in the node set with the same prefix as N."