Re: minimal canonicalization

Rich Salz <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Jul 2002 15:53:47 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.xmldsig
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

I wasn't suggesting a complete rewrite, just the one misleading 
sentence.  I wonder if "convert to base64" is a better minimal c14n.

> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000JanMar/0226.html

I dont think I'll be doing minimal c14n for a reason you alluded to: by 
the time I get called, the document has already been parsed.

	/r$