Re: Next steps for xmldsig

There were no replies to my  suggestion [1] about an option to process
nodes instead of subtrees in XPath Filter 2.0 Transform so I am rasing this
question again. I understand the performance concerns (and I do see small
performance decrease in my tests).However,  I believe this will add 
flexibility
and provide better way to select "complicated" parts of XML document.

Aleksey Sanin.


[1] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2002AprJun/0040.html

Joseph Reagle wrote:

>
>3. XPath Filter 2.0 Transform
>
>Thanks to this week's edits by Merlin (and discussion between Merlin, John, 
>Aleksey, and Christian) I think we've converged on a design and text that 
>we're happy with. If no one objects to the present text [2] (speak now!) 
>I'll stage it for publication as a W3C Last Call Working Draft (and first 
>"official" W3C WD) at the end of this month.
>