Re: Moving exc-c14n forward: your response is needed!
Ari Kermaier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.xmldsig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>As mentioned in [1] and expected in [2] I'd like to move this document >forward. If I request Proposed REC I might be able to make a case for >advancement on the basis of [0], but the more documentation I have, the >better. In particular I'd like to: >1. Fill in the row for the "#default" token and adequate performance for >the empty cells. Yes: The Phaos implementation supports the "#default" token, and performance appears, informally, to be at least as good for exc-c14n as for c14n. >2. Have a report that someone tested it (even informally) in some >application context (e.g., SOAP) and it did what they needed it to do. Not yet, sorry. >3. Have someone else try Gregor's examples. Yes: The Phaos implementation successfully verifies all of Gregor's examples, as bundled in the 2nd version of Merlin's signature. (The 1st version fails, as expected.) Ari Kermaier [email protected] Senior Software Engineer Phaos Technology Corp. http://www.phaos.com/