Re: Consensus Call on Adoption of POSH
"Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.xmpp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CF1002CE.377C7%[email protected]> |
(As chair) JSON comments are *out of scope* for the XMPP working group. Please take your suggestions to the JSON working group if you think you have an approach that can be adopted. On 1/30/14 11:54 AM, "Alexander Holler" <[email protected]> wrote: >Am 30.01.2014 10:13, schrieb Tobias Markmann: >> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Alexander Holler >><[email protected]>wrote: > >> The JSON[2] spec referenced by JWK doesn't mention comments at all. I >>guess >> the JSON you'll use in JWK simply can't include any comments. > >Thats why I said POSH should define how comments shpuld be defined. >Almost any JSON parser provides a syntax for comments (e.g. using # or >//) and I'm unable to understand why comments in JSON aren't standardized. > >And if I read the draft for POSH, e.g. setion 8. shows why one (human) >would like to have comments. > >Regards, > >Alexander Holler >_______________________________________________ >xmpp mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp >