Re: Consensus Call on Adoption of POSH

"Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.xmpp
Message-ID <CF1002CE.377C7%[email protected]>
(As chair)

JSON comments are *out of scope* for the XMPP working group.  Please take
your suggestions to the JSON working group if you think you have an
approach that can be adopted.


On 1/30/14 11:54 AM, "Alexander Holler" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Am 30.01.2014 10:13, schrieb Tobias Markmann:
>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Alexander Holler
>><[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> The JSON[2] spec referenced by JWK doesn't mention comments at all. I
>>guess
>> the JSON you'll use in JWK simply can't include any comments.
>
>Thats why I said POSH should define how comments shpuld be defined.
>Almost any JSON parser provides a syntax for comments (e.g. using # or
>//) and I'm unable to understand why comments in JSON aren't standardized.
>
>And if I read the draft for POSH, e.g. setion 8. shows why one (human)
>would like to have comments.
>
>Regards,
>
>Alexander Holler
>_______________________________________________
>xmpp mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.