Re: Consensus Call on Adoption of POSH
Kevin Smith <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.xmpp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOb_Fnz+BrabDNdd0RQrZd3K4vbqQVQYX_e15jpguLWo_F3ypg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Ben Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > Should we adopt https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-miller-posh/ as a working group item in support of the aforementioned chartered work? Keep in mind that acceptance does not mean the work group thinks the draft is absolutely correct or complete. It merely means that we think that the draft is a good start towards the milestone. I don't much like POSH as a concept; it resolves the issue of virtual hosting certificates (keys) by making it someone else's responsibility to virtual host certificates(keys). However, this is a mostly solved problem for HTTPS and I think the WG should adopt POSH in the absence of better options. /K