Re: IQ Handling vulnerabilities
Ashley Ward <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.xmpp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10 Feb 2014, at 16:38, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/10/14, 6:05 AM, Ashley Ward wrote: >> On 10 Feb 2014, at 12:12, Thijs Alkemade <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I’ve submitted an I-D about this issue here, to help discussion at IETF 89: >>> >>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-alkemade-xmpp-iq-validation/ >> >> Just wondering if it's possible to use a stronger section title than “Recommendations”, or is that standard IETF I-D heading wording? > > We can call it whatever we want. :-) Cool. The only thing I was thinking is that “Recommendation” already has a meaning in this context, but there’s actually some important MUSTs in there. Saying that I can’t think of a good alternative title though! — Ash _______________________________________________ xmpp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 4.1 KB) - not displayed