Re: See-other-uri and insecure web sockets
Ben Campbell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.xmpp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mar 5, 2014, at 1:42 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Well, you need to do *something* if someone tries to connect to <ws://websocketserver.example/xmpp-bind>, but I guess responding with 301 or 404 to the HTTP handshake, prior to protocol handover, would be better than switching to xmpp and then using see-other-uri. > > Yes, I think that's the better approach - the earlier the better. Does that mean we don't need see-other-uri at all?