Re: WGLC of draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket-02
Ben Campbell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.xmpp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Florian, Sergey, and Gordin (and any WGLC commenters that I might have missed) Can you confirm to the list that your comments have been addressed, either in the current version or through conversation? Thanks! Ben. On Apr 22, 2014, at 6:29 PM, Lance Stout <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Apr 22, 2014, at 2:49 PM, Ben Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The WGLC has completed. Authors, please let the list know when you believe all feedback has been addressed. (Note: "addressed" does not necessarily mean "accepted".) > > Draft -06 has been published, which I believe addresses all feedback so far. > > > I note there is a pending question on connection managers, but I don't believe that the use of a connection manager affects any of the actions prescribed in the latest document. CMs should be transparent. > > > We do have Security Considerations listed in XEP-0124 for BOSH connection managers, which amount to 'use TLS from the CM to the backend', and 'use e2e encryption on the client' because guaranteeing anything about a CM's behaviour is beyond scope. I can expand the Security Considerations for this document to do the same, if people deem that necessary._______________________________________________ > xmpp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp