Re: draft-cridland-xmpp-session-00

On Jun 9, 2014, at 9:22 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 6/9/14, 9:46 AM, Lance Stout wrote:
>> +1 for standardizing this. It's a pragmatic solution that lets us cut out a round-trip during session startup without worrying about older servers.
> 
> +1, seems fine. That was the thinking behind RFC 6121 but it seems that we neglected to make the <optional/> flag explicit.

Instead of adding an redundant flag into the XMPP spec. Why doesn’t this draft state the <optional/> flag explicit and give the session as an example? Otherwise we will be adding <optional/> to more features than session.

ck