Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket-07

Dave Cridland <[email protected]> Tue, 8 Jul 2014 17:20:57 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.xmpp,gmane.ietf.gen-art
Message-ID	<CAKHUCzwjsT+p+Frb+1vfOx=BXhAVUm3tG6VfpYikeY1pGp8aew@mail.gmail.com>

On 8 July 2014 16:49, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hi Dave,
>
>
>
> An implementor of RFC 6120 does not know that the XMPP over Websockets
> binding option exists at all. It did not exist by the time 6120 was
> written, so of course, they can do without it. Now that the binding exist,
> the option should be visible IMO.
>
>
>
OK, but why is this case different to, for example, an IMAP extension,
where we don't say "Updates: 3501" every time - indeed, qresync got serious
push-back over the Updates there.

Dave.

_______________________________________________
xmpp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp