Re: [xmpp] Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket-07

On 7/9/14, 7:16 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> OK, I accept this, but in this case the text in the I-D should probably
> be worded slightly different:
>
>  > > The WebSocket XMPP sub-protocol deviates from the standard method of
>
>  > >    constructing and using XML streams as defined in [RFC6120] by
>
>  > >    adopting the message framing provided by WebSocket to delineate the
>
>  > >    stream open and close headers, stanzas, and other top-level stream
>
>  > >    elements.
>
> ‘deviates’ IMO suggests a change to the base specification, not just an
> optional new binding.

How about this:

OLD
    The WebSocket XMPP sub-protocol deviates from the standard method of
    constructing and using XML streams as defined in [RFC6120] by
    adopting the message framing provided by WebSocket to delineate the
    stream open and close headers, stanzas, and other top-level stream
    elements.

NEW
    The framing method for the binding of XMPP to WebSocket differs
    from the framing method for the TCP binding as defined in [RFC6120];
    in particular, the WebSocket binding adopts the message framing
    provided by WebSocket to delineate the stream open and close
    headers, stanzas, and other top-level stream elements.

Peter