Re: 6122bis nit

Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> Wed, 6 May 2015 12:35:04 -0600

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.xmpp
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Yes. I will fix this before publication. Good catch! 

> On May 6, 2015, at 12:24 PM, Florian Schmaus <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I know that 6122bis's IESG state is "Publication Requested", but I've a
> minor remark:
> 
> 3.1:
> 
>      resourcepart = 1*1023(resourcebyte)
>                     ;
>                     ; an "opaquebyte" is a byte used to represent a
> 
> Shouldn't 'resourcebyte' be 'opaquebyte'?
> 
> This was introduced with -18:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-17&url2=draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-18
> 
> - Florian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xmpp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp