Re: AD Evaluation: draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-22
Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <[email protected]> Wed, 20 May 2015 15:16:30 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.xmpp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5/20/15 2:29 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is my AD evaluation of draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-22. I think this is
> ready for IETF last call, and will start that shortly.
Thanks, Ben.
> I have only one comment of any substance:
>
> -- section 3.1, 4 paragraphs from the end makes normative statements
> about the minimum and maximum length for each part of a JID. But the
> sections for each part repeat those statements, creating redundant
> normative language. I don't see disagreements between the sections, but
> it would still be better to avoid the redundancy.
How about this change to remove the normative statement in ยง3.1?
OLD
Each allowable portion of a JID (localpart, domainpart, and
resourcepart) MUST NOT be zero octets in length and MUST NOT be more
than 1023 octets in length, resulting in a maximum total size
(including the '@' and '/' separators) of 3071 octets.
NEW
Each allowable portion of a JID (localpart, domainpart, and
resourcepart) is from 1 to 1023 octets in length, resulting in a
maximum total size (including the '@' and '/' separators) of 3071
octets.
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://andyet.com/