Re: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-xmpp-posh-04: (with COMMENT)

Hi Kathleen, thanks for the review.

On 8/4/15 1:42 PM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-xmpp-posh-04: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xmpp-posh/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Nice work on this draft!  I do have a few comments that I'd like to chat
> about.
>
> In the examples, could you switch them to have sha-256 as the low mark
> instead of sha-1?  sha-1 is only a problem if you need collision
> resistance, but since it's just used in examples, it might be easier to
> just get rid of it.

Good idea.

> In the first paragraph of the Security Considerations section, could you
> add a reference to RFC7525 as well?  Otherwise, it looks great.  It
> should fit in nicely after the RFC2818 reference. Thanks.

+1

Peter