Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-xmpp-posh-04: (with COMMENT)

On 05/08/15 17:06, Barry Leiba wrote:
>> section 8: I dislike the "{servicedesc}" thing, but
>> that's just me. Breaking down servicedesc further into
>> "{service}.{proto}" is worse though, I don't get why
>> that's a good idea at all, nor the "_" convention. If
>> you want/need all that you should've just registered
>> "posh" as a well-known and then said the the rest of the
>> pathname was whatever structure you needed and not
>> possibly end up registering loads of DNA .well-known
>> URLs.
> 
> Yep... I made a similar comment, which Peter and I have been
> discussing.  He's mulling over what to do.

Thanks - I saw that go by but didn't follow. Best
to continue in that other thread I'd say.

S

> 
> Barry
>