LL18: Host with LL address MUST ARP for all addresses

Description of Issue Host with LL address MUST ARP for addresses
Submitter Name  Bernard Aboba
Submitter Email Address  [email protected]
Date first submitted  1 Sep 03
Reference
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/zeroconf/2003-04/msg00029.html
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/zeroconf/2003-06/msg00007.html

Comment Type  Technical
Priority  S (must change)
Section  2.6
Rationale/Explanation of issue:

Lengthy description of problem:
Bernard Aboba wrote:
> On April 11, 2003 Issue LL18 was rejected because the issue never had text
> submitted for it.  In the following post, it was noted that "At such time
> as an issue comes to mind - we will take the submission and open it for
> discussion." See:
> 
> http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/zeroconf/2003-04/msg00029.html
> 
> On June 4, 2003 Stuart Cheshire posted a message suggesting that LL18 be
> revisited:
> 
> http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/zeroconf/2003-06/msg00007.html
> 
> However, since no formal request was made, LL18 was not reopened at that
> time, and as a result, no WG consensus was reached as to whether to allow
> the proposed change.
> 
> At this point, I'd like to make a formal request that LL18 be reopened.

  Requested Change:

> The proposed change is as follows:
> 
> In Section 2.6 Change:
> 
> "If the destination address is a unicast address outside the 169.254/16
> prefix, then the host SHOULD use an appropriate routable IPv4 source
> address, if it has one. If the host does not have a routable source
> address, then it MAY choose to ARP for the destination address and then
> send its packet, with a Link-Local IPv4 source address and a routable
> destination IPv4 address, directly to its destination on the same
> physical link. The host MUST NOT send the packet to any router for
> forwarding."
> 
> To:
> 
> "If the destination address is a unicast address outside the
> 169.254/16 prefix, then the host SHOULD use an appropriate routable
> source address, if it has one. If the host has no appropriate
> routable source address, then it MUST ARP for the destination address
> and then send its packet, with a link-local source IP address and a
> routable destination IP address, directly to the destination on the
> same physical link. The host MUST NOT send the packet to any router for
> forwarding.
> 
> In the case of a device with only a link-local
> address, this requirement can be paraphrased as "ARP for everything".
> In many network stacks, achieving this "ARP for everything" behaviour
> may be as simple as having no primary IP router configured, having
> the primary IP router address configured to 0.0.0.0, or having the
> primary IP router address set to be the same as the host's own
> link-local IP address."