Re: new issue: LL34 Better transition to routable from v4LL using DHCP

Mika Liljeberg <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.zeroconf
Message-ID <1063301667.777.22.camel@hades>
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 15:35, Robert Elz wrote:
> On the other hand, I'm not sure that I'd be happy to have a LAN
> with perhaps hundreds of hosts (maybe thousands) all sending
> continuous streams of broadcast packets looking for a DHCP server.
> (A thousand hosts, with a 25 second (avg) delay is 40 broadcast
> packets a second, which is starting to get too high - make that
> 5000 hosts, which is not unreasonable in some switched environments,
> and you're at 200 broadcast packets a second - which is beyond
> inconvenient and into extremely annoying).

Frequent polling is also a very bad idea from the standpoint of power
efficiency. Not all devices are tethered to a power outlet.

This is really a DHCP issue but it would seem preferable to have DHCP
servers announce their presence (and readines to assign addresses) with
a periodic broadcast, rather than have all the clients broadcasting in
an effort to locate a server.

A new DHCPADVERTISE message could easily be specified in a way that is
fully compatible with current DHCP usage.

Alternatively, I suppose servers could just periodically broadcast an
unsolicited DHCPOFFER, but I haven't really thought this through. There
may be reasons why this would not be a good idea.

	MikaL
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.