Re: [dhcwg] WG consensus action: ACCEPT LL34 better transition to routable from v4LL using DHCP

Mika Liljeberg <[email protected]> Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:55:49 +0300

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.zeroconf,gmane.ietf.dhc
Message-ID	<1064944549.4769.5.camel@hades>

Erik,

On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 20:11, Erik Guttman wrote:
> I do agree with you.  The DHCP client should not be broken or effected
> by IPv4LL.  The host stack which uses both will of course be more
> complex than one which does not.

Are you saying it is ok to run the DHCP and v4LL state machines
independently of each other? I just want to be absolutely clear on this.

	MikaL