Re: WG consensus action: ACCEPT LL34 better transition to routable from v4LL using DHCP

On Tuesday, September 30, 2003, at 02:07 PM, Robert Elz wrote:

> If anything needs to be said, all it needs to be is that the DHCP state
> machine is not altered by LL.   That's it.

That's probably a better way to introduce the note than the MUST NOT 
that I put in.   However, I think it's important to state explicitly 
what sort of interaction we are worried about, and why.   You are right 
that we can't and shouldn't place requirements on the implementor as to 
how he or she implements this - that wasn't my intention, just bad 
wording.