Re: WG consensus action: ACCEPT LL34 better transition to routable from v4LL using DHCP

Ted Lemon <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.dhc,gmane.ietf.zeroconf
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tuesday, September 30, 2003, at 02:13 PM, Robert Elz wrote:

>  | If synching the state machines is a requirement, I'm afraid the 
> DHCP client
>   | will have to do it.
>
> I see no problem with that either, and I don't think Ted does either.
> What he's objecting to (I believe) is changing the nature of the DHCP
> exchange (the DHCP protocol), not really to changing the dhcp client 
> code.

That's right.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.