Re: new issue: [LL36] Combine and rework section 1.7 and 2.11 to be clearer
Alex Karahalios <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:51:01 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.zeroconf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ralph, Sorry to imply you are proposing this text since it's part of section 1.7 already... Alex Karahalios On Dec 16, 2003, at 1:19 PM, Alex Karahalios wrote: > Ralph, > > Yes, I understand this, but I think the phrase you are proposing, a > host "MUST cease advertising the availability of the Link-Local IPv4 > address through whatever mechanisms that address had been made known > to others," will make it such that a new LL IPv4 device will not be > able to interoperate on the network. > > Take the case of a printer using mDNS, for example. A new device would > only get routable address information from the printer, but the new > device is only configured for LL IPv4 and thus is shut out of > communicating with the printer. > > Alex Karahalios > > On Dec 16, 2003, at 11:09 AM, Ralph Droms wrote: > >> Well, section 1.9 of draft-ietf-zeroconf-ipv4-linklocal-10.txt, >> "Communication with Routable Addresses", describes how two devices can >> communicate in the case you describe, where one device has a routable >> address and one device has a Link-Local IPv4 address. >> >> Of course, there's a difference between "finding" and "communicating >> with". >> "Finding" printers is out of scope for Link-Local IPv4, so >> draft-ietf-zeroconf-ipv4-linklocal-10.txt doesn't address how the >> computer >> determines the printer's address, regardless of whether the printer >> is using >> a routable address or a Link-Local IPv4 address. >> >> - Ralph >> >> At 10:25 AM 12/16/2003 -0700, Alex Karahalios wrote: >>> Given the below text which specifies the a host "MUST cease >>> advertising the availability of the Link-Local IPv4 address", could >>> some explain how I would be able to make use of LL IPv4 addressing >>> in the following circumstances: >>> >>> Let's say a printer stops advertising LL IPv4 addresses because it >>> obtains a DHCP address. A new computer is introduced into the >>> network that wants to print, but it cannot obtain a routable >>> address, so it configures a LL IPv4 address. How is the new computer >>> suppose to find the printer if the printer has stopped advertising >>> its LL address? >>> >>> I've asked a similar version of this question before and was told >>> that there are provisions in draft to address this, but the follow >>> text preclude this. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Alex Karahalios >>> >>> On Dec 16, 2003, at 10:00 AM, Ralph Droms wrote: >>> >>>> If a host finds that an interface that was previous configured >>>> with >>>> a Link-Local IPv4 address is now configured with a valid routable >>>> address, the host MUST always use the routable address when >>>> initiating new communications, and MUST cease advertising the >>>> availability of the Link-Local IPv4 address through whatever >>>> mechanisms that address had been made known to others. The host >>>> SHOULD continue to use the Link-Local IPv4 address for >>>> communications underway when the routable address was configured, >>>> and MAY continue to accept new communications addressed to the >>>> Link-Local IPv4 address. Ways in which a valid routable address >>>> might be configured for the interface include: >> >