Re: new issue: [LL36] Combine and rework section 1.7 and 2.11 to be clearer

Alex Karahalios <[email protected]> Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:35:07 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.zeroconf
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Eric,

OK, I see now. Based on section 3.3, a LL only device can sent directly 
to a routable address device (provided it's on the same link). And by 
section 2.6.2 the LL only device will ARP for the routable address.

Sorry for being dense about this. I was just focusing on section 1.7.

Thanks,

Alex

On Dec 19, 2003, at 6:40 AM, Erik Guttman wrote:

> You are incorrect in asserting there is a problem.
>
> A host whose interface is configured with a link-local address can
> communicate with a host with a routable address (See Section 2.6.2).
> The host with the link-local address may also *discover* the address
> of a host with a routable address (on the same link), for example by
> using mDNS.
>
> A host with a routable address which complies with this specification
> can communicate with a host configured with a link-local address
> (See Section 3.3).  The host with the routable address that receives
> discovery messages (such as sent by mDNS) will respond.  If the 
> discoverer's source address is link-local, the discovered service will
> respond to that destination address.