Re: new issue: [LL36] Combine and rework section 1.7 and 2.11 to be clearer
Alex Karahalios <[email protected]> Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:35:07 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.zeroconf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Eric, OK, I see now. Based on section 3.3, a LL only device can sent directly to a routable address device (provided it's on the same link). And by section 2.6.2 the LL only device will ARP for the routable address. Sorry for being dense about this. I was just focusing on section 1.7. Thanks, Alex On Dec 19, 2003, at 6:40 AM, Erik Guttman wrote: > You are incorrect in asserting there is a problem. > > A host whose interface is configured with a link-local address can > communicate with a host with a routable address (See Section 2.6.2). > The host with the link-local address may also *discover* the address > of a host with a routable address (on the same link), for example by > using mDNS. > > A host with a routable address which complies with this specification > can communicate with a host configured with a link-local address > (See Section 3.3). The host with the routable address that receives > discovery messages (such as sent by mDNS) will respond. If the > discoverer's source address is link-local, the discovered service will > respond to that destination address.